Diego Costa set for Chelsea exit: Man United, Liverpool or Arsenal keen?

The Brazil-born striker had been linked heavily with a move to Atletico Madrid but their transfer ban may have shelved that plan for now.
So, where could he go -- and would he suit one of Chelsea's Premier League rivals?
ESPN FC's club bloggers and correspondents give their verdict on whether Costa would fit in at their club.
CHELSEA
Given the controversy that seems to continually surround Costa and that he seems to operate just one fit of pique away from a lengthy suspension, it is not impossible to see why Conte might be seeking alternative options. Factor in the the well-publicised training ground spat between the two in January and the intervening months have seemed like a marriage of convenience.
That said, Costa's contribution to two title winning campaigns in the last three seasons should not be underestimated. His deluge of goals upon signing in 2014 got Chelsea off to a flying start from which they held their challengers at bay while last season his goals and performances before Christmas led many neutrals to tout him for the player of the year awards.
Costa is clearly a difficult character to work with and he appears in a constant state of disillusionment. But while both player and club might be keen to cut their ties, it is Chelsea that are more likely to be left yearning for what they have lost. -- Phil Lythell
TOTTENHAM
No, absolutely not.
Tottenham already have the best striker in the Premier League in Harry Kane but even if he left or got injured, the club would be looking for a replacement with the exact opposite human qualities to the combustible Costa.
While the his goals helped Chelsea to another league title (and he appears to be a likeable character off the pitch), Costa is a troublemaker who craves being the centre of attention. Mauricio Pochettino's success at Tottenham has been built with a squad of players who have full faith in the manager and his project, and all of whom are playing for each other, in the knowledge they could comfortably double their money elsewhere.
Signing Costa would not only be unnecessary, it would jeopardise all the impressive work done by Pochettino at the club. -- Dan Kilpatrick
MAN UNITED
It would be daft of United if they weren't interested in Costa. He's exactly the type of striker they're looking for -- strong, physical, aggressive -- and on top of that, he's proven in the Premier League.
It sounds like he's available from Chelsea, although it's debatable whether Conte would want his main scorer heading to Old Trafford, even if he is surplus to requirements at Stamford Bridge. That, though, is out of United's control. If he's on the move, they should at least put themselves in the mix.
The same would go for any of the league's best forwards, whether it's Sergio Aguero or Alexis Sanchez. Jose Mourinho might feel the Costa isn't worth the trouble after seeing the worst of the Spaniard during the final months of his second spell at Chelsea. But he's the type of player fans hate -- unless he's on your team.
That alone would suggests he would fit in well at United under Mourinho. -- Rob Dawson
MAN CITY
It is easy to take the moral high ground and say that Costa's antics would not fit in at your own club, but the truth is he is an extremely effective performer, both in his scoring, forward play and the darker arts of provocation and general skulduggery.
With City well-stocked in the forward positions, there is little use for a striker of his kind, especially as he is as far removed from the typical Pep Guardiola mould for a position that sometimes scarcely exists in the Catalan's mind as could be imagined.
Costa has been a good servant to Chelsea, if a little erratic and troublesome. There are not many around who can guarantee you a steady flow of goals and a strong presence at the point of the attack. If his type existed as a centre-half, maybe City would be tempted to put a sneaky bid in for him. -- Simon Curtis
LIVERPOOL
Liverpool were the only club in the top seven without a prolific striker so if there was an opportunity to land Costa, they should go for it. He's a player opposing fans love to hate, but everyone wants a player like Costa in their team. He's proven quality and he's a winner. Some of his antics often leave much to be desired but it's easy to overlook that when he's scoring over 20 goals a season.
Liverpool tried to pair Costa with Luis Suarez in the summer of 2013 (the mind boggles at how that might have turned out!) but the striker opted to stay in Spain and then joined Chelsea a year later.
In light of their spectacular own goal with Virgil van Dijk, if the Reds could somehow acquire Costa that would go some way towards redeeming themselves in the eyes of the fans. -- Dave Usher
ARSENAL

Arsenal fans loathe few players more than Costa, but that doesn't change the fact he'd be perfect for the Gunners in many ways. A physical scoring machine with a nasty streak is many ways exactly what Arsenal need.
Whether they need Costa's antics and off-pitch drama is another story entirely. But Arsene Wenger wanted to buy Suarez despite his Liverpool controversies, so perhaps he thinks he could tame Costa as well.
There's no doubt Costa would make Arsenal a better team, but there's a serious risk he would unsettle the dressing room as well. So it's hard to imagine Wenger giving serious pursuit. -- Mattias Karen

play
Sid Lowe firmly believes Barca have a desire to acquire Hector Bellerin, but thinks he isn't their top priority this summer. (1:56)

Last week, Real Madrid won their third Champions League of the past four seasons. They're also the defending Liga champions and an economic juggernaut that boasts one of the two best players in the world (and a gaggle of superstars beyond him), as well as a manager who thus far has barely put a foot wrong and who seems tailor-made for them.
So if those are the ingredients for a dynasty, who is best placed to unseat them?
Take this exercise for what it is: a bit of crystal ball juggling. And bear in mind, we're at the start of the summer transfer window. Tons can, and probably will, happen.
Another caveat: we're not talking about who "can" win the Champions League next year. Nor is it simply about unseating Real Madrid. We're talking about who (if anyone) is best placed to build sustained European and domestic success over the next few years. This doesn't just mean building a great side and delivering silverware; it means having the clout to retain talent, both playing and managerial. And it means being able to deliver domestically on a regular basis as well.
(NOTE: the order is strictly alphabetical)

ARSENAL

WHY THEY WILL: They're a major club with a big stadium in a major city where it's easier than elsewhere to attract talent. Arsene Wenger has told us endlessly that there's plenty of money to spend.
WHY THEY WON'T: For a start, they're a year behind schedule in that they won't even be in the Champions League until 2018-19 at the earliest. And there's plenty of competition for places in the Premier League, which doesn't help. Wenger turns 68 in October and continues to divide opinion. The future of two of their biggest stars, Alexis Sanchez and Mesut Ozil, remains in limbo. And even if they stick around, this still feels like a long-term project. Historically, have had serious issues retaining their major stars.

BARCELONA

WHY THEY WILL: They're an economic juggernaut and one of the best brands in the game. They have Lionel Messi and a stellar supporting cast, both in terms of production and star power. Spanish clubs tend to do well in European competition.
WHY THEY WON'T: Messi has yet to extend his contract, which expires in just over a year's time. You assume he will, but until that happens, there's uncertainty. Their new boss Ernesto Valverde has been coaching for 15 years and is only just now ascending to a mega-club. It's not lost on anyone that their recent success has come with "philosopher-king" types like Pep Guardiola and Luis Enrique in charge, rather than more pragmatic guys (Tata Martino, anyone?). There is still some important strengthening to be done in key roles.

BAYERN MUNICH

WHY THEY WILL: They dominate the Bundesliga and have reached the Champions League quarterfinals in five of the past six seasons. Together with Manchester United, Barcelona and Bayern, they're one of the quartet of clubs that are far ahead of everyone else commercially. They can vacuum up talent domestically whenever they like. No coach has won the Champions League more times than Carlo Ancelotti and the Bundesliga's winter break is a boon to clubs in European competition.
WHY THEY WON'T: Most of their key performers are 28 or older, which means this feels like a team of the present more than one of the future. It's unclear how much steamrolling the Bundesliga helps you succeed in Europe. Over the next year or so, they'll need to replace Xabi Alonso, Philipp Lahm, Arjen Robben and Franck Ribery, which means there's a lot that can go wrong.

CHELSEA

WHY THEY WILL: Antonio Conte has managed for six full seasons with four different clubs and won the league in five of those six. (The one time he didn't win, with Siena in Serie B, he finished second and won promotion). No English club has won more trophies in the Roman Abramovich era. They're expanding their grounds and that will generate even more revenue. Eden Hazard is a genuine superstar, ready to go to the next level.
WHY THEY WON'T: Conte's record in knockout competitions is comparably humdrum. They need to add serious depth now that they're playing in Europe as well. Diego Costa is hit or miss and will reportedly leave. Hazard is injured and perpetually linked to moves elsewhere. The redeveloped Stamford Bridge won't be ready until 2023 and they face several seasons at Wembley (never a good thing) in between.

JUVENTUS


WHY THEY WILL: They've come within 90 minutes of winning it all twice in the past three seasons. They have a revenue-generating stadium and a strong brand that can still be better commercialized. Max Allegri is a clever manager who has just re-committed himself to the club for the long term. Qualifying for the Champions League won't be an issue. And while the squad isn't young, they've already secured some very promising talent (Riccardo Orsolini, Marko Pjaca, Mattia Caldara, Daniele Rugani, Paulo Dybala...)
WHY THEY WON'T: Ten of the 14 players we saw in Cardiff will be the wrong side of 30 by the end of next season. As good as the kids might be, their window of opportunity is now, not in a few years' time. While this season offered a little bit more of a challenge domestically, Serie A doesn't do much in terms of toughening you up for European competition. The departures of Paul Pogba, Alvaro Morata, Arturo Vidal and Carlos Tevez in recent years suggest talent retention isn't that easy for them.

LIVERPOOL

WHY THEY WILL: Jurgen Klopp is hugely popular and hugely admired. He has total buy-in from the fan base. Liverpool are a very solid brand; they continue to grow commercially and have expanded their stadium. This will be Klopp's second full season and the one where you expect to see a great leap forward in terms of tactics and chemistry.
WHY THEY WON'T: For all their storied history, they've only finished in the top four twice in the past eight seasons and the Premier League isn't getting any less competitive. They still can't match the very big boys in terms of buying power, and the Fenway Sports Group have shown little appetite for massive spending. There are still plenty of holes to plug in the squad. Talent retention might be a problem going forward.

MANCHESTER CITY

WHY THEY WILL: Pep Guardiola helped build the last dynasty at Barcelona, and his brand of football has proved successful in the past. He's been in the Champions League eight times and has advanced to the final four on seven occasions. They've shown a willingness to spend, and while they probably can't outspend their crosstown rivals Manchester United over time, for now they feel they're a match for anyone. They skew young, and they're entertaining to watch.
WHY THEY WON'T: The learning curve has been really steep in year one of Guardiola's Premier League career, particularly in the field of goalkeepers and defenders. Who's to say he won't repeat the same mistakes? They need more and better investment this summer, ideally guys who can satisfy the homegrown player requirement. And again, a top four finish in England is not something you can take for granted.


MANCHESTER UNITED

WHY THEY WILL: They're a gigantic cash cow, topping the Deloitte Football Money League of the world's richest clubs and raking in some $300 million more than the next highest Premier League club. That means resources aren't a problem. Jose Mourinho has won the Champions League with two different clubs and conquered a European trophy just last year. They have a decent core of talent to rally around and a fan base hungry for success.
WHY THEY WON'T: They finished 34 points off the pace last season and Zlatan Ibrahimovic, the guy who scored nearly a third of their goals (while missing more than a fourth of their league campaign), is injured and may never play for them again. Mourinho himself said he needs several more transfer windows to get the squad he wants. Rebuilding United in his image is a slow burner, and by the time they're ready, someone else may have snatched the dynasty tag.

PARIS SAINT-GERMAIN

WHY THEY WILL: They're the only show in town in one of Europe's biggest and most glamorous (not to mention wealthiest) cities, and they have deep-pocketed owners. Qualifying for the Champions League is virtually automatic. Despite domestic disappointment last year, the squad is already very strong.
WHY THEY WON'T: Unai Emery was disappointing in his first season and doesn't seem like the kind of guy you associate with dynasties. They have tons of money, but they don't seem to spend it particularly well. For too many of their guys, PSG feels like either a stepping-stone or a payday rather than a long-term destination.

TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR


WHY THEY WILL: Mauricio Pochettino is one of the most coveted managers out there, and they have exciting young attacking talent while being taught at the back, which is never an easy combination. They are London-based, so they're attractive to some of the pickier overseas players, and their new stadium is bound to boost revenue.
WHY THEY WON'T: Talent retention has been an issue in the past. And while it's hard to see Harry Kane ever playing for anybody else, you'd imagine clubs will come calling for Pochettino, Dele Alli and others. They were disappointing at Wembley, last year and the prospect of playing a whole season there isn't great. It still feels like ownership wants to boost revenue first and spend big later, which could be problematic at this level.

Post a Comment

0 Comments